From Nature Restoration to National Restoration Plans

On 4 November, SUPERB collaborated with the European Forest Institute’s ThinkForest webinar for an in-depth look at nature restoration with a focus on forests, asking what support the latest science can offer.

Elisabeth Schatzdorfer, Principal Scientist at EFI presented some of the lessons learned from SUPERB, building on its multidisciplinary scientific and practical findings, including those from 12 large-scale demonstration sites across Europe. 

There are many objectives for forest restoration – including restoring or improving biodiversity, resilience, forest products and services. Research shows a majority of the European public supports forest restoration; however, it is important to note that restoration can’t fulfil every objective at the same time. There are always trade-offs and space must be left for compromises.

Guided by the idea of transformative change rather than disruption and immediate change, SUPERB used a toolbox of restoration measures in its diverse demo areas in cooperation with stakeholders to test and showcase how restoration can be done to the benefit of nature and people. To be effective and sustainable, measures need to be adapted to the local context and synergies and trade-offs need to also be considered. Elisabeth emphasised that there is no silver bullet for optimising restoration – we need to be careful with the idea that if we restore biodiversity all other problems are automatically solved too. In addition, there is not a universally agreed endpoint for restoration – we need to take a holistic, forward-looking and adaptive approach, fully involving stakeholders.

A thoughtful panel discussion highlighted some of the challenges and opportunities for integrating the latest science into the design of National Restoration Plans (NRPs). These must be submitted by each EU Member State by 1 September 2026, under the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. 

Łukasz Rejt from the Polish Ministry of Climate and Environment emphasised the importance of transmitting scientific knowledge from projects to policymakers and government experts. The project findings and proposed measures should be understandable for policymakers and accessible in local languages, to enable the knowledge to make its way into the NRP.  

Jenni Roche from the National Parks and Wildlife Service, Ireland, pointed out that this communication should be two-way. Individual Member States have their own very specific needs and diverse contexts – so it is important for researchers and projects to be clear about the applicability of their findings. 

Florian Claeys from DG Environment also highlighted that there is not a single blueprint for restoration – it is dynamic, evolving continuously through experience. The latest science should be at the core of this evolution. Research would also be extremely important on monitoring methods. 

The panel also focused on engagement, and the participation of local communities in the process, which was seen as one of the keys to success. 

Katarina Tumpa from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Croatia highlighted the need for education – to encourage people from all areas of the country (not just big cities) to participate, and to help them develop an understanding of the trade-offs. Education can help to show that different local communities can see the forest from very different points of view, and encourage people to accept different perspectives. The panel also highlighted the importance of engaging widely, for example via online questionnaires, conferences and public hearings. 

Summing up, the panel recommended:

  • Knowledge and dialogue, to bring the best solutions 
  • Thinking big – aiming for large scale and looking for multiple benefits across measures and policies
  • When working on national restoration plans also thinking regionally – your forest is your neighbour’s forest
  • Not being afraid of the Nature Restoration Regulation – it provides a chance to reinvent our relationship with nature

This news item was originally published here.

Biodiversity Blending at Bangor

Restoration Story by Anna Wood and Simon Creer

Identifying which insects live where in forests can help us study how biodiversity in forests changes. This is what our SUPERB team at Bangor University is working on.  Our partners from the SUPERB demo sites in Spain, France, Sweden, Czech Republic, Romania and Serbia collected over 1,600 arthropod samples over the last three spring/summer seasons and sent them to the Molecular Ecology and Evolution group at Bangor University in the UK. 

To find out which insects live in our demo sites, we need to capture and identify a representation of the insect community that live in an area of a forest. One method of doing this is using a Malaise trap (see picture above). It looks like a tent, and its function is to trap flying insects and direct them into a bottle of ethanol that preserves them. It is possible to identify some of the insects from their physical appearance, but many insects are difficult to identify just by looking at them, but they can be identified from the DNA present in their bodies. 

DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding of “Insect Soup”

DNA barcoding takes advantage of the fact that many species have genes that are more similar within a species than between species. These variable regions, or ‘DNA barcode’ regions, are often sandwiched in between more conserved regions of the genome. Using molecular biology, we can use the conserved regions and amplify the barcode region using a technique called PCR (the polymerase chain reaction), from which we can generate a DNA sequence. This sequence can become a DNA barcode for each species, forming a global reference library of barcodes that can be used for species identification. DNA metabarcoding follows the same theory, but instead of using DNA from one individual or one sequence, it uses DNA from the whole communities of different species to generate millions of sequences.

The first step is to homogenise or blend the entire mixed insect sample into an “insect smoothie.” From this, it’s possible to extract DNA from all the different insects, which can be PCR’ed sample by sample and sequenced all together using high-throughput sequencing. When the sequences are compared to the DNA barcoding reference library, we can identify which insect species are found in our forests. Metabarcoding can be used for many different sample types, and in SUPERB, we are also using it to identify fungi, plants and microscopic animals’ species from soil samples collected in the same forests. 

Over the last 3 years we have blended over 1600 malaise insect samples, which involved washing over 3200 blender cups. The metabarcoding laboratory work for all the SUPERB project samples is now complete and currently being sequenced.

We will be analysing the insect metabarcoding data, along with soil metabarcoding and other datasets collected at the same forest sites, to explore the above and below ground biodiversity in Europe’s forests. We hope to have exciting data to share soon, and we’ll be take a well-earned break from making insect smoothies until next time!

Forest Quest: A New Adventure at Queen Elizabeth Forest Park to Connect People with Nature

Together with the FORWARDS project, Forestry and Land Scotland (FLS), Forest Research and BOKU University, SUPERB is proudly launching the Forest Quest, a self-guided trail at our demo site in Queen Elizabeth Forest Park (QEFP). The Forest Quest will invite forest visitors to connect with the natural environment while learning about the forest, how it is changing under climate change, and what approaches our local partners take to manage it in a biodiversity-friendly and climate-smart way. Through a series of tasks outlined on boards in the forest and through an app, the Quest will help the visitors engage with the forest at their own pace, taking the time to explore and observe along dedicated trails. After completing the quest, participants will receive a “Quest badge” and can enter a draw for a chance to win a prize of a zipline ticket.

This initiative is the result of a collaborative effort between SUPERB and FORWARDS, two EU-funded projects that address the impacts of climate change on forests and forest landscapes.

The Forest Quest will be open for participation until 31st August 2025. 

To find out more about FORWARDS, please visit this website: https://forwards-project.eu/

A networked forest park: Exploring online engagement with Queen Elizabeth Forest Park in Scotland

Restoration Story by Liliana Bounegru, Jonathan Gray and Rina Tsubaki

What can the Internet and social media tell us about the life of a forest park?

As part of our SUPERB project, we have been studying online engagement to understand more about the social and cultural contexts of forests and forest restoration efforts across Europe. 

This includes looking at how the Internet and social media are involved in different ways of relating to the site known as Queen Elizabeth Forest Park (QEFP) in Scotland.

Forest names

QEFP is known by many names. To understand how these names are used online, we looked at how search results for place names associated with QEFP suggest other place names.

Just as a snowball gathers snow when rolling down a hill, through an approach known as “query snowballing” we gathered 195 names from following the recommendations of search results pages. When searching for each of these names you can find different kinds of pages, pictures and media. Each of these names and associated search results reflect different ways of articulating relations with this place.

195 forest names: Snowballing place names with Google Related Searches

Forest relations

The web pages of search results show how people relate to the park in different ways, including as hikers, cyclists, canoeists, campers, drivers, fishers, photographers, horse riders, bird watchers, dog walkers, foragers, swimmers, artists, tourism workers, hotel owners and local history enthusiasts. 

We find pages of reviews, ratings, recommendations, discussions of climate change policy, weather reports, lists of park creatures, and blog posts on foraging to make nettle soup.

To explore how the web invites different kinds of relations with this site, we made a speculative account of forest park life composed of texts from search results.

A network graph of search results showing web pages (green nodes)
and the themes associated with them (red nodes).

Forest infrastructures

Image search results also show different ways of relating to the forest park. As well as beautiful landscapes and touristic snaps, they also show things which are involved in inviting relations with forests – such as signs for navigating, bridges for walking, rental homes for staying, guide books for learning, and watermarked pictures for selling.

A selection of Google Search image results grouped according
to how they invite relations with the forest park.

Forest news

Looking at online news search shows headlines associated with the forest park. As well as articles about tourism and recreation, there are stories about rewilding and reintroducing animals such as lynxes, and the consequences this might have for sheep farming.

A selection of news headlines grouped according
to how they invite relations with the forest park.

Forest videos

There are also many videos in search results. Looking at some of the most engaged with videos associated with the forest park, we find vlogs (video logs), listings, landscape footage and forest park drive through videos.

A selection of engagement formats in YouTube videos.

Forest posts

Social media posts show different ways in which the park is engaged with. In some of the most engaged with Facebook posts we encounter the forest park as a site of archaeology (e.g. distillery ruins), recreation (e.g. wellbeing retreats with forest bathing) and decarbonisation (e.g. through government investments).

Other posts discuss beavers as agents of forest biodiversity restoration, wildlife corridors to support ecosystem restoration, peatlands for climate resilience and tree mythology.

Alluvial diagram showing associations between
themes and actors in most engaged with Facebook posts.

Forest hashtags

Social media posts mentioning the park also contain hashtags which tell us how people relate to it. For example, on Twitter/X we found recreation (e.g. #birdwatching, #cycling, #wildswimming, #painting), campaigning (e.g. #savelochlomond) and media engagement (e.g. #bbcwildlifepotd). 

Beyond the most popular, we found hashtags about climate change (#cop27, #climateemergency), health (#naturetherapy, #ournaturalhealthservice) and accessibility (#wheelchair).

A selection of popular hashtags grouped by theme.

Forest sounds

There are also many sounds on posts, pages and videos associated with the forest park. As part of the forestscapes project we have been creating soundscapes from these different kinds of online sounds – from birdsong, wind and waterfalls, to cycling, songs and stories.

A selection of videos with sounds of creatures, elements, voices and movement in the park.

Forest futures

What can we learn from these kinds of online materials? In a world in which many forests are increasingly networked and digitalised, we can learn about them not only by following paths and counting plants, but also by following links and counting posts.

Online materials show how forests are digitally mediated and how they come to matter in different ways. We can see how across online spaces some ways of mattering become more visible, while others are less visible, or missing.

As well as studying its plants and creatures, we can also pay attention to other kinds of cultures and relations, issues and infrastructures, economies and experiences that make up the park.

Taking these into account can offer valuable insights to support ecosystem restoration plans. They can also help us to reconsider what more inclusive, equitable and sustainable forest futures could look like.

Find out more


This post draws on collaborative research undertaken by Jonathan W. Y. Gray, Liliana Bounegru, Rina Tsubaki and Gabriele Colombo as part of our SUPERB project.

Upcoming summer school – Adapting forests to climate change: Operationalizing assisted migration

Building on the success of its inaugural edition in 2023, the Austrian Research Centre for Forests (BFW), the Czech University of Life Sciences (CZU), and EVOLTREE will collaboratively host the third Summer School on Adapting Forests to Climate Change: Operationalizing Assisted Migration, to be held at the Forestry Training Centre of Austrian Research Centre for Forests, FAST-Traunkirchen, from 28th July to 1 August 2025.

This summer school aims to provide in-depth insight into the Assisted Migration of forests in climate change with a focus on models to guide decision support. Specific topics are:

  • Develop machine-learning based models to identify and spatially map adapted and maladapted populations of forest tree species in climate change.
  • Quantitative genetic mechanisms of local adaptation and, through excursions to forest provenance trials.
  • Integration of assisted migration with forest tree breeding, and the primary delivery systems of adapted forest reproductive material, including seed orchards and forest nurseries.
  • Digital Innovation Technologies in Forestry: high- throughput phenotyping for analyzing biotic and abiotic stressors and much more under controlled conditions

👩‍🎓 WHO CAN APPLY?
Master’s students, PhD candidates, postdocs, and professionals in forestry, genetics, and climate adaptation.

🎓 Earn ECTS credits from CZU upon course completion!

You can find more details and application instructions here.

Webinar: Evolution of Forest Restoration Approaches in Europe: What Can We Learn?

Forest restoration has long been a response to environmental challenges, evolving over time to address shifting ecological, economic, and societal needs. This talk explores how restoration approaches in Europe have developed over the past century—from early efforts to mitigate deforestation impacts to post-war timber production goals and the modern emphasis on multifunctionality.

In the upcoming Forest Restoration Talk, Maitane Erdozain Ibarra from Forest Sciences and Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC) will provide an overview of three key periods in European forest restoration, tracing the shifts in objectives and strategies over time. Katharina Lapin from Austrian Research Centre for Forests will then discuss insights from seven European countries, examining the drivers of degradation, successful restoration practices, and the role of policy and community engagement in shaping the future of forest restoration.

Join us for an engaging discussion on the lessons learned from past restoration efforts and their relevance for today’s environmental challenges!

📅 9th April, 16:00 CEST
📍Register here: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_q5PagtkpTQeRGU7skdJjvA#/registration

Webinar: Making Nature Markets Work in the 21st Century: Lessons from England, Australia, and the EU

There is a global biodiversity funding gap, and efforts to mobilize private finance to fill it are accelerating. For over 50 years, biodiversity markets have been developed to attract return-seeking investment into conservation, but what have we learned about making them truly work for nature?

In our upcoming Forest Restoration Talk, Sophus zu Ermgassen from University of Oxford will explore insights from nature markets in England and Australia and share findings from our SUPERB project.

If you would like to learn more about the role of private finance, policy, and regulation in biodiversity conservation, don’t miss this webinar!

🕓 4:00 PM CET, 12 March 2025

Click here to register!

Webinar: Primary and old-growth forests in east and south-east Europe: structure, dynamics, biodiversity and implication for ecological forest management

Our Forest Restoration Talk Series is back! In this first webinar of 2025, we will dive into the fascinating world of primary and old-growth forests in East and South-East Europe.

In this webinar, Martin Mikolas and Miroslav Svoboda from the Czech University of Life Sciences will share their extensive research on the structure, dynamics, and biodiversity of these forests in the Balkans and Carpathians. As part of the REMOTE project, they have spent over 15 years studying such forests, their carbon storage capacity, and their critical role as habitats for rare species. The discussion will also touch on how this knowledge is shaping ecological forest management strategies that mimic natural processes to preserve biodiversity.

Martin Mikolas is a forest ecologist specializing in forest biodiversity, particularly in primary forests. Miroslav Svoboda, a professor of forest ecology and management, focuses on forest dynamics, natural disturbances, and biodiversity-driven forest management practices.

🕓 4:00 PM CET, 12 February 2025

🗓️ Don’t miss this insightful talk! Register here to attend.

10 Things We Can All Learn from the Evolution of Forest Restoration Initiatives in Europe 

By Maitane Erdozain Ibarra, CTFC & Rina Tsubaki, EFI.

Forest restoration is far more than a modern buzzword—its history runs deeper than most realize. Yet, despite decades of effort, the lack of proper documentation of successes and failures has prevented us from truly learning from the past.  

Today, the global push for forest restoration is stronger than at any point in history. Initiatives like the European Nature Restoration Law are sparking hope and action. Now, more than ever, we need to look back and reflect on how forest restoration efforts have evolved, what sparked change, and what lessons past and present initiatives can offer. That will empower us to make forest restoration efforts more effective, impactful, and grounded — both now and in the future. 

A Europe-wide Study to Explore Trends, Patterns and Drivers of Forest Restoration 

Led by Maitane Erdozain and Sergio de Miguel from the Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC) and the University of Lleida (UDL), we published a study that examined narratives from 32 forest restoration experts in 18 European countries to uncover the history of forest restoration in Europe. The study asked experts to delve into six key areas—social, economic, political, technical, environmental and legal— to understand different drivers that shaped forest restoration across Europe. 

The analysis revealed fascinating trends and patterns. Early restoration efforts in central and southern Europe often arose in response to crises like natural disasters and timber shortages. While these initiatives were effective for erosion control and timber production, they often relied on monocultures and short rotations, limiting ecological benefits. The geopolitical upheavals of the 20th century pushed timber production to the forefront, with centralized management that usually favored productivity over biodiversity. Since the 1990s, however, we have started to see a shift: restoration now strives to balance environmental, social, and economic goals, driven by a growing appreciation for the multifunctionality of forests. 

Lessons from Successes and Failures in the Past and Present 

So, what are the drivers that shaped the development of forest restoration in Europe that we can learn from both the past and present?  

Here are 10 lessons we learned: 

  1. Natural disasters as catalysts: Major natural disturbances (floods, shifting sands etc.) triggered early restoration efforts in many countries. Over the past decades, environmental crises (climatic, biodiversity, water etc.) have also influenced the type of restoration that is conducted. 
  1. Geopolitical turmoil forces change: Wars greatly contributed to forest degradation through direct destruction and overexploitation, but they also prompted large-scale afforestation campaigns to address timber shortages. These initiatives shaped today’s forests, showing how crises can simultaneously hinder and drive restoration progress. 
  1. Forest ownership and governance: Centralized forest governance often enabled large-scale restoration success, while fragmented ownership often slowed down restoration progress. Innovative governance mechanisms are needed to address the issue of fragmentation, where many small landowners hold land rights.
  1. Funding mechanisms: Lack of funding has been a longstanding obstacle, but there are examples of strong and stable funding mechanisms throughout history.  Although EU funding has been instrumental in shifting the types of restoration implemented, there is an urgent need for innovative funding sources (e.g., private) and mechanisms that are long-term and resilient to political and market fluctuations. 
  1. Market fluctuations: Shifts in demand for products like timber and fuelwood significantly shaped restoration strategies. Future efforts should integrate marketable benefits from different ecosystem services to sustain landowner engagement and secure lasting outcomes. 
  1. The role of sociodemographics and social values: Rural abandonment tends to reduce land-use conflicts but can lead to new challenges like unmanaged forests. Increasing environmental awareness and recreational demands from society have diversified restoration objectives. These findings underscore the need for active rural engagement and public education to balance priorities. 
  1. Policies as guiding forces: Strict yet balanced national policies that integrate ecological protection with socioeconomic benefits, alongside ambitious international policies and the creation of institutions specialized in restoration, have been pivotal in driving progress and inspiring coordinated restoration strategies. 
  1. Converging drivers accelerate change: Restoration succeeds when environmental, social, economic and political factors align. Historical examples show that isolated drivers rarely catalyze change; a multidimensional approach is essential to create transformative impacts. 
  1. Conflicts hinder progress: Competing objectives, such as agriculture versus forest land uses, or timber production versus conservation, remain major obstacles. Addressing conflicts—both among stakeholders and policies—requires a holistic landscape approach that simultaneously addresses many challenges that society faces. 
  1. Short-term fixes, long-term risks: Lastly, the historical accounts demonstrate that restoration efforts with a short-term vision often create future vulnerabilities. Long-term thinking that acknowledges the interconnectedness of our systems is crucial for successful forest restoration that benefits ecosystems and communities.  
Infographic by Shanqing Gao, EFI

Embracing the Past and Building a Better Future

From this study, we learned the importance of blending historical insights with contemporary strategies to guide more sustainable and impactful forest restoration. By learning from past successes and failures, policymakers and practitioners can avoid repeating mistakes and leverage effective solutions. We hope the lessons uncovered in this research will be crucial for implementing the new Nature Restoration Law to ensure its ambitions are translated into large-scale, real-world impact across Europe. 


Reference: Erdozain, M., Alberdi, I., Aszalos, R. et al. The Evolution of Forest Restoration in Europe: A Synthesis for a Step Forward Based on National Expert Knowledge. Curr. For. Rep. 11, 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/40725-024-00235-3

Read the full study here.

How to strengthen the European forest carbon sink integrating active restoration and adaptation to climate change

Climate change is progressing faster than tree species can adapt or migrate to regions with more suitable climates. Geographic barriers and fragmented habitats caused by land use hinder the natural spread of trees, making passive restoration efforts — those with little or no human involvement — less effective.

A new policy brief that SUPERB published in collaboration with our project partner European Forest Institute, explains how active forest restoration combined with assisted migration of more climate-adapted tree species and populations, has the long-term potential to enhance carbon sequestration significantly compared to restoration efforts without assisted migration. Assisted migration means aligning tree species and populations to the climate to which they are adapted. This measure is a significant element of the so-called “Prestoration” approach SUPERB is taking, which stands for a combination of restoration and climate change adaptation of forests.  

The policy brief also looks at what policymakers can do to effectively implement and potentially refine the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. The authors point out that realistic restoration targets should be set so they can be achieved despite ongoing climate change, and adaptation should also be pro-actively tackled within the Natura 2000 system.  

Full reference: 
Chakraborty, D., Schüler S.,  Ciceu, A., Bauhus, J., Bou Dagher, M., Đodan, M., Kramer, K., Svensson, J., Schatzdorfer, E. 2024. How to strengthen the European forest carbon sink through prestoration: integrating active restoration and adaptation. Policy Brief 11. European Forest Institute. https://doi.org/10.36333/pb11


Featured image: SUPERB demo area in Vysočina and North Moravia, Czech Republic (photo: Shanqing Gao)