Seeds of renewal: collaboration for climate-resilient forests in North Rhine-Westphalia 

Article written by Louisa Bouri-Saouter and Gesche Schifferdecker

When tourists come to visit Germany’s most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia, some wonder what has happened. Around the Lömecke Tower, an observation tower about 35 meters high in the Arnsberg Forest Nature Park, the once endless spruce forests are gone. Since 2018, about 133,000 hectares of spruce forest have been damaged by a series of calamities that triggered a snowball effect. Hurricane Friederike destroyed large areas of spruce forest and droughts weakened the trees further by reducing their resin production, a precious fluid which normally helps trees protect themselves against pests. Bark beetles, which mainly attack dying or weakened spruces, did not miss the opportunity. 

Larissa Janzen, coordinator for the German Demonstration Area in the EU project SUPERB, recalls in our recent workshop: “It happened very quickly. We even heard stories of forest owners losing their entire forests in just two weeks!” For forestry professionals who have witnessed entire landscapes transform in record time, the sound of bark beetles destroying the trees is still unforgettable. 

Calamities affected all altitudes, creating fragmented landscapes 

However, despite the initial shock, restoration efforts were quickly initiated. Under the SUPERB project, restoration actions have been carried out across 29 demonstration sites (around 34 hectares) with different types of ownership – private, municipal, church, and state.  The Wald und Holz team, the NRW lead partner in the SUPERB project, reports that 46% of the 133,000 hectares of calamity area have been reforested through natural regeneration of spruce and pine. “But it is important to note that these species might not be the best suited to face future conditions,” observes Larissa Janzen. 

That is why another key restoration action implemented in North Rhine-Westphalia is the adaptation of tree species composition to climate change. To achieve this, the team creates species distribution models that take into account factors such as water availability, soil nutrients, temperature, and vegetation. They can then identify which species (including species which are currently not growing in NRW) could potentially grow and survive under new climate conditions in the area. 

Larissa Janzen is showing the landscape transformation in record time around the Lömecke Tower 

However, miscalculations can occur, and the uncertainty regarding the potential impacts of certain tree species on local ecosystems remains. For this reason, multiple species are often combined to increase their overall chances of survival. 

Kilian Marx, a specialist in forest growth and introduced tree species at Wald und Holz, highlights the complexity of tree species selection: “Everyone talks about species first, but there are huge differences within the same species. For example, the Douglas fir has a coastal and an inland variant, but only the coastal one can be planted here because it can resist diseases such as the Swiss needle cast that would kill the inland type.” 

All findings from the Wald und Holz work on tree species selection are shared with forest owners. Through a GIS-based tool, owners can explore which tree species would best fit on their sites through recommendations based on RCP (Representative Concentration Pathways) future climate projections. They can then make their own decisions about their forest management in alignment with both the federal and state forest laws. 

Kilian Marx is talking to journalists during a field visit about the importance of tree species selection 

An important component of climate-adapted forest restoration – what experts now call prestoration – begins outside the forest itself, in places like the Jungermann regional forest nursery, the “Kinderschule des Waldes,” where every tree’s journey starts as a seed in soil. Here, the work stretches from careful seed selection to optimizing genetics to finally raising the young plants that will repopulate damaged landscapes. Much has changed, says Nursery owner Stefan Jungermann: “Where once 7,000 seedlings were planted per hectare, today only about 2,000 are set into the ground.” 

After the bark-beetle calamities, demand collapsed by more than 80% for water-hungry species, shifting attention toward mixed forests, though private forest owners still favor economically valuable conifers when state funding for broadleaves is lacking, Jungermann explains. The nursery cultivates seedlings on 8,000 square meters of harvest area, part of its total 130-hectare operation, and must adapt constantly to the risks of climate extremes. One wet winter wiped out an entire cohort of oak seedlings – 300,000 lost as acorns fouled in saturated soil. Late frost is even more dangerous: in February, if temperatures drop, the whole team wakes before dawn to spray the young plants, encasing them in a protective shell of ice. With the state of NRW providing 17 million euros for reforestation in 2025 – less the following year – every decision counts, from choosing between equally priced oak and larch (though oak is far costlier to maintain) to experimenting with “trendy” newcomers like sweet chestnut, atlas cedar, and Western Red Cedar. There is no single “tree of the future,” the Jungermann family insists; resilience will come from diversity and matching species to their sites.  

Tourism, too, is undergoing a quiet transformation as the Sauerland landscape changes. Although visitor numbers have not declined, the region’s identity is shifting: the dense, seemingly endless spruce forests that once defined the area’s “green” image have largely disappeared – “revealing, in hindsight, how strongly monocultures had shaped the visual character of the landscape”, says Rouven Soyka, press officer at Sauerland Tourism. With 5,000 km², Sauerland still contains many intact and diverse forest areas, yet the contrast between damaged and healthy stands is unmistakable to hikers and holidaymakers. Climate change is also reshaping winter tourism, as snow reliability continues to drop and ski seasons shrink. To address public concerns and maintain transparency, the city of Arnsberg, foresters and tourism managers together have intensified the outreach, offering guided tours and organizing citizen planting days. While these volunteer plantings contribute little to large-scale restoration, they have proven invaluable for public engagement, helping visitors and residents alike understand the painstaking, decades-long process of rebuilding a resilient forest – and the new forms of beauty and biodiversity that may emerge. 

In this careful choreography between climate, species, and human stewardship, the Wald und Holz team and their diverse local partners stand together at the quiet but crucial beginning of tomorrow’s forests. 

Welcome to our new Forest Knowledge Gateway! 

Do you have questions about forest restoration and its role in helping forests adapt to climate change? Are you curious to learn more about integrative forest management? 

The recently launched Forest Knowledge Gateway is a dynamic knowledge base, continuously updated with new insights, tools, and practical guidance on forest restoration, climate change adaptation, biodiversity conservation and integrative forest management. Users can browse hundreds of resources by navigating a rich taxonomy organized by topic, restoration, management purpose, geographic region, and more.  

The Forest Knowledge Gateway has been thoughtfully designed for four key forest stakeholder groups: Landowners & Practitioners, Planners & Implementers, Policy Actors, and Funders & Investors. Created by several experts, our stakeholder-targeted “Knowledge Pathways” oguide users through a synthesis of the most relevant knowledge, resources, and tools to support specific needs. 

A set of online guidelines, covering areas such as monitoring, forest restoration practices, and upscaling strategies, provides more in-depth support for users seeking topic-specific guidance. 

One of our latest additions is The Restoration Marketplace. This platform, linked to the Gateway, helps match nature-positive projects with potential funders. Landowners can use the Marketplace to make their proposed projects visible to funders, and investors can discover innovative nature-based projects. 

Finally, if you need help finding something, you can use our Frog Bot, an AI-powered assistant that guides you to relevant information, tools, and resources. It answers questions, provides quick links, and supports multiple languages – making it easier  to navigate the Gateway and discover what you are looking for. 

The Forest Knowledge Gateway is led by the European Forest Institute. It has been developed in close collaboration with a wide range of research and practice organizations, co-designed with key stakeholders, and supported by policy actors. It was created as part of the SUPERB project and will continue to be maintained and further developed under the HorizonEurope project TRANSFORMIT.  

From pixels to pines: exploring Bulgaria’s Rhodopes Forests

#RestorationStory by Annabel Burg, Sietse van der Woude, and Niamh Kelly

It was the last day of June 2025 when our small group set out from Schiphol Airport. Traveling with us, three PhD students from Wageningen University and Research, were two colleagues: Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Professor of European Forest Resources at Wageningen University, and Thomas Groen, Associate Professor of Remote Sensing at the University of Twente. Our destination was Bulgaria – a country that, until then, most of us knew little about. We were curious, not only about its history and culture, but especially about its landscapes. Despite its modest size, Bulgaria is blessed with mountains, rivers, caves, and lakes. More than one-third of the country is covered by forests, making it one of Europe’s most densely forested and biodiverse nations.

The roots of this journey stretched back a few months earlier. In February, during a meeting in Suceava, Romania, Gert-Jan had spoken with Tzvetan Zlatanov, Professor of Ecosystem Research at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. That conversation marked the beginning of a collaboration. In the weeks that followed, Tzvetan shared with us a treasure trove of information: a forest inventory database compiled from over 150 forest enterprises across Bulgaria, with data on about one million forest stands. It was an extraordinary resource. But data can only take us so far. To truly understand forests, we also need to see them. And so, this trip was born – part scientific mission, part field validation, and part opportunity to experience Bulgarian forests firsthand.

Read More

Forest Modelling: Exploring the Future of Scottish Forests under Diverse Restoration Actions 

Restoration Story by Louisa Bouri-Saouter

Have you ever wondered what it would be like to look into the future? With climate change on the horizon, many hope to understand what we are walking into. So, what if we could get a glimpse of tomorrow’s forests? What if we could see what this vital ecosystem is becoming or could become? When it comes to Scottish forests, that’s exactly what six researchers have explored*. 

By using forest resource modelling, researchers have projected what would happen to forests in Scotland when different forest restoration activities are applied. In total, 1,411,958 hectares of forests were simulated, within which the forest restoration activities were carried out on 33% of this total area (approximately 463,536 hectares). Forest development under a « Business-As-Usual » scenario and two different restoration scenarios were projected over the next 30 years, until 2055. 

Map of initialized NFI plots in Scotland, in total 15 523 plots. Colour of the bar represents the initial dominant species or species group per plot, and height of the bar shows the initial growing stock volume.

Here’s what the projections reveal about these two restoration scenarios: 

Following current Scottish Government regulations on sanitation felling in larch forests infested with pathogen Phytophthora ramorum, the first scenario focused on the implication of Larch removal on 65,007 hectares (5% of Scotland’s forest area). This large-scale sanitation felling, including the removal of larch trees near infested areas to prevent the spread of pathogen, was followed by the replanting of a mix of future-suitable species such as Sitka spruce, birch, and rowan.

Projection results show a clear increase in harvested volumes during the first five years as a direct result of the larch removal. However, this short-term rise gradually declines and stabilizes over time, aligning with the harvested volumes observed in Business-As-Usual scenario. Replanting with a diverse mix of future-suitable species also supports faster forest recovery and has a positive long-term effect on soil carbon stocks.

Since the primary constraint to the management of productive forests in Scotland is the risk of wing damage, the second scenario meant to support the conversion of 28% of Sitka spruce forests located in high-risk wind areas to coniferous continuous cover forest (CCF), creating more complex and diverse forest structures. Despite an overall decline in growing stock and harvested volumes, forest structure began to shift: after 30 years, more medium- to large-sized Sitka spruce trees (20–50 cm in diameter) were present.

This structural diversification is expected to result in higher growing stock volumes and greater structural diversity in Sitka spruce forest stands in wind-prone areas, potentially contributing to improved resilience over the next three decades. 

Growing stock (m3/ha) development per species over diameter classes (cm) from 2025 till 2055 for the three different scenarios.

Today, monocultures of Sitka spruce cover 45% of Scottish forests. But recent shifts in UK forest policies are set to transform this landscape, reducing these vast monocultures to create room for more structurally diverse forests. These changes hold great promise for improving biodiversity, flood mitigation, and the recreational value of these forests. 

These scenarios, brought to life through advanced forest resource modelling, give us the chance to better understand the trajectories and consequences of applied restoration measures. A glimpse into tomorrow’s forests that could significantly change their course. 

*Projections of Scottish forest restoration activities are part of SUPERB project’s deliverable D6.5 on the projected ecosystem data and were carried out by Sara Filipek, Silke Jacobs, Tom Locatelli, Bruce Nicoll, Daniele Ferraretto and Gert-Jan Nabuurs.

Biodiversity Blending at Bangor

Restoration Story by Anna Wood and Simon Creer

Identifying which insects live where in forests can help us study how biodiversity in forests changes. This is what our SUPERB team at Bangor University is working on.  Our partners from the SUPERB demo sites in Spain, France, Sweden, Czech Republic, Romania and Serbia collected over 1,600 arthropod samples over the last three spring/summer seasons and sent them to the Molecular Ecology and Evolution group at Bangor University in the UK. 

To find out which insects live in our demo sites, we need to capture and identify a representation of the insect community that live in an area of a forest. One method of doing this is using a Malaise trap (see picture above). It looks like a tent, and its function is to trap flying insects and direct them into a bottle of ethanol that preserves them. It is possible to identify some of the insects from their physical appearance, but many insects are difficult to identify just by looking at them, but they can be identified from the DNA present in their bodies. 

DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding of “Insect Soup”

DNA barcoding takes advantage of the fact that many species have genes that are more similar within a species than between species. These variable regions, or ‘DNA barcode’ regions, are often sandwiched in between more conserved regions of the genome. Using molecular biology, we can use the conserved regions and amplify the barcode region using a technique called PCR (the polymerase chain reaction), from which we can generate a DNA sequence. This sequence can become a DNA barcode for each species, forming a global reference library of barcodes that can be used for species identification. DNA metabarcoding follows the same theory, but instead of using DNA from one individual or one sequence, it uses DNA from the whole communities of different species to generate millions of sequences.

The first step is to homogenise or blend the entire mixed insect sample into an “insect smoothie.” From this, it’s possible to extract DNA from all the different insects, which can be PCR’ed sample by sample and sequenced all together using high-throughput sequencing. When the sequences are compared to the DNA barcoding reference library, we can identify which insect species are found in our forests. Metabarcoding can be used for many different sample types, and in SUPERB, we are also using it to identify fungi, plants and microscopic animals’ species from soil samples collected in the same forests. 

Over the last 3 years we have blended over 1600 malaise insect samples, which involved washing over 3200 blender cups. The metabarcoding laboratory work for all the SUPERB project samples is now complete and currently being sequenced.

We will be analysing the insect metabarcoding data, along with soil metabarcoding and other datasets collected at the same forest sites, to explore the above and below ground biodiversity in Europe’s forests. We hope to have exciting data to share soon, and we’ll be take a well-earned break from making insect smoothies until next time!

Webinar: Forest adaptation and restoration – a global challenge with a local scope 

How can we address the challenges of forest degradation and biodiversity loss while balancing the needs of local and global communities? Join us for our upcoming Forest Restoration Talk on 11 December 2024, at 4:00 PM CET, where we will explore these pressing questions.

In this webinar, Prof. Dr. Andreas Bolte and Alfred Aleje will discuss the challenges and opportunities of forest restoration, focusing on lessons learned from global and local perspectives. Prof. Dr. Bolte will begin by introducing forest adaptation and restoration on the global scale. Following this, Alfred Aleje will take us to southern Ethiopia, where a combination of active and passive restoration measures has proven effective in promoting plant diversity recovery at local and landscape scales. 

🗓️ If you don’t miss this last Forest Restoration Talk of this year, register here!

Restoration Talk: Multi-taxon approach for biodiversity conservation and management

Lessons-learnt from “BOTTOMS UP”

How can European forests be managed for biodiversity conservation? How can – the quite complex – biodiversity data be collected, how can progress be monitored in the best way, and what is needed from policy making? In our upcoming Forest Restoration Webinar on 13 November 2024, 4pm CET, we will feature a panel of speakers from COST-Action “BOTTOMS-UP”, a recently completed cooperation project that gathered information on forest multi-taxon biodiversity to inform sustainable forest management.

Sabina Burrascano (Sapienza University of Rome), Yoan Paillet (French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment, INRAE), and Flora Tinya (HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Hungary) will share their lessons-learnt on biodiversity conservation and monitoring, the role experimental research can play, and discuss how this can be linked to forest ecosystem restoration approaches in Europe.

Register here!

Forest Restoration: Carbon, Water and So Much More

Forests and trees do so much more than simply capturing carbon. While carbon storage provides a vital service, a focus on the crucial role of carbon alone neglects the many other vital contributions forests make. For example, their role in sustaining biodiversity, contributing to local people, and maintaining the water cycle, require greater emphasis. In their essay Frontiers | Restoring deforested drylands for a wetter future – harnessing trees for credits, climate and water (frontiersin.org) , SUPERB’s Koen Kramer (LandLife Company) and Douglas Sheil (Wageningen Research and University) emphasize the importance of considering water alongside carbon when planning dryland restoration efforts. With the right tree species in the right locations, we can improve both carbon capture and the water cycle.

The authors argue that in case of drylands, changes in atmospheric water should be recognised as human-induced factor for enhanced global warming. Their argument is that vast areas of dryland forests have been cleared over the last 2 centuries, which has resulted in desiccation, i.e. reduced condensation and thus less cooling of the atmosphere.

In other words, human-induced deforestation enhanced the greenhouse effect of water vapor in the atmosphere and should therefore be recognised as direct effect determining climate change. If recognized, this effect can be expressed in CO₂ equivalents and existing markets can be used to fund restoration of deforested drylands.

This is, as the experts admit, a bold idea. The effects of trees and forests on local hydrology, albedo, and atmospheric moisture content is much debated in the scientific community as they depend on local orographic conditions, distance to sea, tree cover and species composition, and so on.

Nevertheless, at a larger scale, desiccation by deforestation and rewetting by reforestation is increasingly recognized. With the right tree species in the right locations, we can improve both carbon capture and the water cycle, emphasize Koen and Douglas. This could form the base to improve the land and lives of those living there. Water matters because everything else depends on it.

“Everything you need to know about biodiversity credits”: A Crash Course with SUPERB’s Dr Sophus zu Ermgassen  

As an expert in biodiversity finance and offsetting, ecological economist Dr Sophus zu Ermgassen from Oxford University likes to investigate the question of how to make “biodiversity credits work for nature”.  

In a recent webinar for IUCN CEM’s Impact Mitigation and Ecological Comensation Thematic Group, the researcher notes that there’s a tension between “what is required to make these credits work for nature and what makes them financially attractive investments”. The question of how to both satisfy the needs of nature and those of finance will therefore become more and more central within the upcoming years. 

While similarly defined as what we know from carbon credits, Sophus explains that biodiversity credits remain a largely contested concept. He currently frames them as a “commodified unit of biodiversity gain” upon which buyers can then make claims about. This means that a buyer could purchase a credit and in turn say they have improved biodiversity by a certain amount (depending on the biodiversity metric).  

Yet there remains much tension between what we want biodiversity credits to be and how they are currently employed, says Sophus. With a huge amount of variation in biodiversity credit initiatives, he explains that there is little consensus about what exactly should be measured as well as how it should be done. This also relates to measuring the very impact of biodiversity credit investments themselves. Non-systematic samples and a wide variety of monitoring methods also make it difficult to currently govern biodiversity credits.  

What Sophus argues for is that we should pay much more attention to causation, as otherwise we are not delivering what we are claiming. This means developing more credible and robust scientific credit methods, so that we do not risk “commodifying nothing”. He mentions that sometimes people, for instance, receive payments for forests that were never under threat of being cut down anyways.  

Scientifically credible biodiversity credits must therefore showcase that they deliver something additional to a specific site and context; this means that credits should have actually made a difference for the level of biodiversity that can be measured. By paying more attention to causation, Sophus argues that we can be much more precise about what falls under biodiversity credits and what not. 

To learn more about current debates on biodiversity credits listen to the full webinar via this link. 

Restoring after forest dieback: First Public Engagement Workshop in our German demo area

Article written by Rahel Könen

The pressure to act and restore the forest ecosystem is immense in our German demo area in North-Rhine Westphalia: Having suffered massive pest outbreaks 6 years ago, the region still struggles with widespread forest dieback. As many forest owners have been challenged in the past years, restoration efforts in the area remain at early stages.

After spending the morning with diverse stakeholders from forestry, tree nurseries, nature conservation, hunting and more, discussing restoration goals and different expectations to forests, we continued with a 2.5-hour public engagement workshop walking through one of our SUPERB demonstration sites close to Arnsberg.

Photo credits: Rahel Könen

To set the stage for the public engagement workshop in the forest, Gesche Schifferdecker shared some insights from an analysis of Facebook posts around the NRW forest area implemented by Rina Tsubaki. These ranged from red deer loving nature photographers to hunting associations emphasizing the role of game management for forest natural regeneration and afforestation to representatives of the City of Arnsberg introducing the forest management plans for a climate resilient mixed forest. The participants were very interested in the online debates and surprised about some of the opinionated comments below the posts. This led to a reflection upon the role of social media in public engagement, and how for example forestry practitioners could proactively contribute to a more balanced debate.

Photo credits: Rahel Könen

The discussions continued in our SUPERB demo area, with a guided tour by SUPERB demo manager Catharina Schmidt. As our SUPERB interventions focus on both environmental and social factors of forest restoration, we discussed in the field diverse topics from climate resilience, selection of tree species, impressions of trellis and tubes covering the newly planted trees, walkability, the role of deer pressure for forest restoration, to the importance of deadwood for biodiversity. Amongst other questions, we asked: “How does this site look to you?, “how do you perceive the role of hunting in the forest?”, and “how does the sight of lying and standing deadwood make you feel?” 

With over 15 participants, these questions led us to insightful and open-hearted discussions about the struggles and needs of this forest area, its ecosystem and its people.